Roseville Joint Union High School District · Educational Services

Where the district stands, school by school.

A read of the 2026 LCAP perception survey across the eight comprehensive high schools — staff, students, and parents — designed for cabinet to triage attention, name strengths, and choose where to lean. Quantitative scores and qualitative voice from every comprehensive site.

Internal · Cabinet Confidential · March 2026

District pulse.

Weighted by sample size at each site. Roseville Adult is excluded from this cabinet view as a non-comprehensive program.

Mean score · 8 schools · 3 stakeholder groups
Staff
4.13district mean
560respondents
Biggest cross-site gap±1.47Teachers
Students
3.80district mean
5,610respondents
Biggest cross-site gap±1.15Working in small groups.
Parents
3.93district mean
916respondents
Biggest cross-site gap±0.85The school meets the social needs of the students.

Schools versus items.

Themes with biggest school-to-school spread · Staff
Each item, each school, side by side
District mean

The full grid: every site against every survey item. Cells warmer than a 4.00 baseline read as positive; cooler cells flag growth areas. Hatched rows are sites with fewer than 30 respondents — read those means with caution. Hover any cell for the underlying number.

SchoolLike I belong at this school.That the staff cares about me.That learning can be fun.That learning is fun at this school.Recognized for good work.Intrinsically rewarded for doing my j…Clear about what my job is at this sc…That others are clear about what my j…Treat me with respect.Listen if I have ideas about doing th…Are effective instructional leaders.Facilitate communication effectively.Support me in my work with students.Support shared decision making.Allow me to be an effective instructi…Are effective in helping us reach our…Develop my skills.Think for myself, not just carry out…Differentiating instruction.Effective professional development re…Integrating instruction across the cu…Teaching to the state standards.The use of computers.The use of varied technologies.Providing a threat- free environment.Positive relationships between studen…Addressing student learning styles.Effective parent involvement.Using ongoing student assessments rel…Student self-assessments.Teacher use of student achievement da…Working at this school.Seeing the results of my work with st…Every student can learn.The instructional program at this sch…This school provides an atmosphere wh…Quality work is expected of all stude…Quality work is expected of me.Quality work is expected of all the a…The vision for this school is clear.The vision for this school is shared.We have an action plan in place which…This school has a good public image.It is important to communicate often…I communicate with parents often abou…I communicate with parents often abou…Special education students.English learners.Ethnically and racially diverse stude…Students who live in poverty.Low-achieving students.TeachersStudentsSupport StaffAdministratorsStudent outcomes for my class(es) are…Student outcomes for my class(es) are…Teachers in this school communicate w…I know the state standards.I teach to the state standards.Learning is fun in my classroom.I love to teach.
Adelante HSN=17 · low n4.354.354.533.594.244.004.123.884.594.294.063.764.414.004.294.064.594.594.354.413.823.353.293.764.654.594.474.183.473.714.124.184.594.763.654.243.534.593.883.473.823.823.184.533.943.414.244.294.414.474.473.473.243.653.594.334.084.254.504.254.254.42
Antelope HSN=774.254.054.353.913.704.054.323.884.303.923.884.014.133.884.143.964.044.064.323.874.113.613.513.964.554.664.324.173.784.044.044.134.594.573.824.003.774.233.863.943.843.793.844.163.793.324.264.144.424.424.223.223.423.423.684.314.213.734.274.164.234.26
Granite Bay HSN=974.304.074.464.043.694.214.423.994.214.023.603.633.903.514.083.604.154.284.354.014.103.753.403.884.604.714.324.293.764.074.154.374.694.604.553.894.184.433.983.803.683.554.404.093.793.344.304.064.484.424.293.553.623.613.454.494.353.754.334.124.404.58
Independence HSN=11 · low n4.454.554.454.004.184.364.363.644.554.274.003.454.403.274.273.734.454.184.364.094.273.914.364.364.734.734.454.363.733.913.914.184.274.733.824.093.824.093.643.273.453.363.274.184.093.094.364.364.644.554.553.363.553.273.364.404.204.104.604.303.894.30
Oakmont HSN=674.224.134.484.013.684.234.273.654.254.063.843.854.013.763.973.884.044.124.274.064.023.573.443.864.634.754.214.333.713.924.204.214.644.633.973.613.634.363.873.843.673.703.814.293.823.214.174.124.394.364.233.583.603.523.754.314.133.914.334.224.264.58
Roseville HSN=744.274.294.474.073.864.054.333.774.303.974.013.804.123.913.954.004.084.124.233.894.013.683.363.784.454.574.304.333.723.783.954.334.584.573.894.003.744.464.074.033.953.893.644.324.043.504.234.194.314.264.223.663.823.643.774.304.184.044.264.234.194.30
West Park HSN=1014.364.274.474.203.964.164.433.974.464.274.073.824.213.984.234.124.414.284.414.254.223.893.544.054.604.644.324.234.034.214.354.374.644.544.074.083.984.584.244.304.213.984.324.333.923.544.314.104.434.374.234.013.913.914.044.514.384.074.454.314.334.52
WoodCreek HSN=1164.314.214.504.103.924.224.383.974.414.124.144.224.234.114.254.224.174.274.364.184.223.793.594.044.574.624.334.223.903.994.094.434.634.643.934.153.804.394.134.284.194.074.504.283.953.514.344.204.454.424.323.913.893.934.094.464.323.984.324.234.394.50
DISTRICT (n-weighted)4.324.224.474.093.884.184.383.934.374.113.983.924.153.904.164.014.214.234.344.094.143.753.533.964.584.664.334.253.844.024.144.344.634.614.054.023.874.434.064.053.973.874.124.243.893.434.264.174.444.404.293.723.743.733.844.424.283.964.354.224.314.48

District priorities.

Three reads of the same data: where the district as a whole is weakest, where the gap between sites is largest (the highest-leverage cabinet conversations), and where to protect the wins.

Lowest district scores · 5 lowest items per stakeholder

Staff Staff

Students Students

Parents Parents

Lowest district scores

Where staff feel the gap most across the system.

  1. 3.43I communicate with parents often about class activities.
  2. 3.53The use of computers.
  3. 3.72Teachers
  4. 3.73Support Staff
  5. 3.74Students
Largest school-to-school spread

High-leverage items: leadership and site culture move the needle here.

  1. ±1.47Teachersμ 3.72
  2. ±1.38This school has a good public image.μ 4.12
  3. ±1.38Support shared decision making.μ 3.90
  4. ±1.37The vision for this school is clear.μ 4.05
  5. ±1.34Support Staffμ 3.73
District strengths

The highest-scoring items across the system. Worth protecting.

  1. 4.66Positive relationships between students and teachers.
  2. 4.63Seeing the results of my work with students.
  3. 4.61Every student can learn.
  4. 4.58Providing a threat- free environment.
  5. 4.48I love to teach.

Themes by school.

Items rolled up to seven themes. A quick read of which sites lean strong and weak across the LCAP construct map.

SchoolBelongingSchool prideRecognition & supportLeadership & visionFairness & respectInstruction & learningCommunicationParent engagementSelf-perception (skills)Expectations & rigorEquity & student groups
Adelante HS N=174.203.894.173.824.594.113.914.183.714.064.38
Antelope HS N=774.064.083.883.914.304.053.824.174.044.004.29
Granite Bay HS N=974.124.333.873.784.214.143.714.294.074.304.31
Independence HS N=114.183.904.033.604.554.193.704.363.913.954.49
Oakmont HS N=674.014.143.903.824.254.103.794.333.923.994.25
Roseville HS N=744.194.093.953.964.304.063.924.333.784.104.24
West Park HS N=1014.264.334.134.154.464.253.904.234.214.284.29
WoodCreek HS N=1164.254.374.104.174.414.203.994.223.994.104.35
DISTRICT4.194.254.024.014.374.163.874.254.024.154.31

Priorities — district.

The system-wide growth areas, derived directly from the data above. Each card names a stakeholder, the lowest-scoring actionable theme in their view, the three lowest items as evidence, and a one-line read on whether the gap is uniform across sites or driven by site-level variation. Use these to scope cabinet focus and resource allocation.

Stafftheme mean 3.87·cross-site spread 0.71

Communication

Staff rate this theme at 3.87 on a 1–5 scale, the lowest actionable area in their stakeholder view, with a 0.71-point spread between top and bottom sites — site leadership is moving the needle here.

Evidence — three lowest items
  1. 3.43I communicate with parents often about class activities.
  2. 3.89I communicate with parents often about their child's progress.
  3. 3.92Facilitate communication effectively.
Stafftheme mean 4.01·cross-site spread 1.11

Leadership & vision

Staff rate this theme at 4.01 on a 1–5 scale, the lowest actionable area in their stakeholder view, with a 1.11-point spread between top and bottom sites — site leadership is moving the needle here.

Evidence — three lowest items
  1. 3.84Administrators
  2. 3.87We have an action plan in place which can get us to our vision.
  3. 3.93That others are clear about what my job is at this school.
Studentstheme mean 3.60·cross-site spread 0.97

School pride

Students rate this theme at 3.60 on a 1–5 scale, the lowest actionable area in their stakeholder view, with a 0.97-point spread between top and bottom sites — site leadership is moving the needle here.

Evidence — three lowest items
  1. 3.39This school is fun.
  2. 3.53Make learning fun.
  3. 3.88I think this is a good school.
Studentstheme mean 3.62·cross-site spread 0.87

Belonging

Students rate this theme at 3.62 on a 1–5 scale, the lowest actionable area in their stakeholder view, with a 0.87-point spread between top and bottom sites — site leadership is moving the needle here.

Evidence — three lowest items
  1. 3.35Know me well.
  2. 3.55I like the students at this school.
  3. 3.61Listen to my ideas.
Parentstheme mean 3.66·cross-site spread 0.56

Leadership & vision

Parents rate this theme at 3.66 on a 1–5 scale, the lowest actionable area in their stakeholder view, with a 0.56-point spread between top and bottom sites — site leadership is moving the needle here.

Evidence — three lowest items
  1. 3.56There is adequate supervision before and after school.
  2. 3.77There is adequate supervision during school.
Parentstheme mean 3.86·cross-site spread 0.47

Instruction & learning

Parents rate this theme at 3.86 on a 1–5 scale, the lowest actionable area in their stakeholder view, with a 0.47-point spread across sites — modest variation, system-wide patterns dominate.

Evidence — three lowest items
  1. 3.52Teachers help me know how to support my child's learning at home.
  2. 3.75The school succeeds at preparing its students for future work.
  3. 3.95The school meets the academic needs of the students.

Priorities — by school.

For each comprehensive site, the lowest-scoring actionable theme per stakeholder relative to the district mean — with the three items most below district as evidence. Schools at or above district on everything actionable show what to protect rather than what to fix. Each card includes an open-ended echo: the top growth themes from that stakeholder's qualitative comments, to confirm or qualify the quantitative read.

Adelante HS

StaffN=17 · low n — read with caution

Instruction & learning

Staff at Adelante HS sit roughly -0.78 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.65The instructional program at this school is challenging.-0.40 vs 4.05
  2. 3.35Teaching to the state standards.-0.39 vs 3.75
  3. 3.47Using ongoing student assessments related to state standards.-0.37 vs 3.84
StudentsN=37

Instruction & learning

Students at Adelante HS sit roughly -0.61 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.28I am working in a small group.-0.39 vs 3.67
  2. 3.73Listening to the teacher talk.-0.35 vs 4.08
  3. 3.49Answering questions from a book or worksheet.-0.29 vs 3.77
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from students comments: Facilities & campus (9).
ParentsN=13 · low n — read with caution

Communication

Parents at Adelante HS sit roughly -0.30 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.23The school clearly communicates how parent volunteers can help.-0.30 vs 3.53
  2. 3.77The school provides an adequate calendar of school activities.-0.29 vs 4.06

Antelope HS

StaffN=77

Instruction & learning

Staff at Antelope HS sit roughly -0.64 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.22Teachers-0.50 vs 3.72
  2. 3.73Teachers in this school communicate with each other to make student learning co…-0.23 vs 3.96
  3. 3.82The instructional program at this school is challenging.-0.23 vs 4.05
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from staff comments: Workload & rigor (5), Facilities & campus (5).
StudentsN=748

Instruction & learning

Students at Antelope HS sit roughly -0.35 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.90Using computers.-0.18 vs 4.08
  2. 3.67Set high standards for learning in their classes.-0.14 vs 3.81
  3. 3.95Listening to the teacher talk.-0.13 vs 4.08
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from students comments: Lunch & food (71), Teachers & instruction (42), Athletics & extracurriculars (34).
ParentsN=68

Communication

Parents at Antelope HS sit roughly -0.24 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.90The school provides an adequate calendar of school activities.-0.17 vs 4.06
  2. 3.78My inquiries are answered in a timely manner.-0.15 vs 3.93
  3. 3.81New students receive adequate orientation to the school and the programs offere…-0.15 vs 3.96
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from parents comments: Athletics & extracurriculars (5), Mental health & counseling (3), Safety & supervision (3).

Granite Bay HS

StaffN=97

Leadership & vision

Staff at Granite Bay HS sit roughly -0.55 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.60Are effective in helping us reach our vision.-0.41 vs 4.01
  2. 3.45Administrators-0.38 vs 3.84
  3. 3.55We have an action plan in place which can get us to our vision.-0.31 vs 3.87
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from staff comments: Leadership & administration (6), Mental health & counseling (6), Workload & rigor (5).
StudentsN=1203

At or above district — protect strength

Students rate items at or above district across actionable themes. The work here is to protect what is being done well — particularly on the items below.

Evidence
  1. 3.94I feel challenged at this school.+0.24 vs 3.70
  2. 4.04My ability with mathematics.+0.22 vs 3.82
  3. 3.91The work at this school is challenging.+0.22 vs 3.69
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from students comments: Teachers & instruction (102), Lunch & food (77), Workload & rigor (63).
ParentsN=232

Communication

Parents at Granite Bay HS sit roughly -0.12 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.81My inquiries are answered in a timely manner.-0.12 vs 3.93
  2. 3.41The school clearly communicates how parent volunteers can help.-0.11 vs 3.53
  3. 3.39The school provides adequate information about non-college options after gradua…-0.11 vs 3.50
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from parents comments: Mental health & counseling (20), Safety & supervision (15), Workload & rigor (12).

Independence HS

StaffN=11 · low n — read with caution

Leadership & vision

Staff at Independence HS sit roughly -0.95 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.27The vision for this school is clear.-0.78 vs 4.05
  2. 3.45The vision for this school is shared.-0.51 vs 3.97
  3. 3.36We have an action plan in place which can get us to our vision.-0.50 vs 3.87
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from staff comments: Communication & info flow (3).
StudentsN=139

Instruction & learning

Students at Independence HS sit roughly -0.50 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.05Working in small groups.-0.60 vs 3.65
  2. 3.27I am working in a small group.-0.40 vs 3.67
  3. 3.80Listening to the teacher talk.-0.28 vs 4.08
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from students comments: Workload & rigor (4), Athletics & extracurriculars (4), Schedule & bell schedule (3).
ParentsN=27 · low n — read with caution

Communication

Parents at Independence HS sit roughly -0.53 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.07The school clearly communicates how parent volunteers can help.-0.45 vs 3.53
  2. 3.63The school provides an adequate calendar of school activities.-0.43 vs 4.06
  3. 3.69The school provides adequate information to students about attending college af…-0.25 vs 3.94

Oakmont HS

StaffN=67

Instruction & learning

Staff at Oakmont HS sit roughly -0.43 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.97Allow me to be an effective instructional leader.-0.19 vs 4.16
  2. 3.57Teaching to the state standards.-0.18 vs 3.75
  3. 4.13Student outcomes for my class(es) are clear to my students.-0.15 vs 4.28
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from staff comments: Safety & supervision (4), Communication & info flow (4), Schedule & bell schedule (4).
StudentsN=943

School pride

Students at Oakmont HS sit roughly -0.16 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.72I think this is a good school.-0.16 vs 3.88
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from students comments: Lunch & food (76), Teachers & instruction (75), Athletics & extracurriculars (58).
ParentsN=102

At or above district — protect strength

Parents rate items at or above district across actionable themes. The work here is to protect what is being done well — particularly on the items below.

Evidence
  1. 3.76The school clearly communicates how parent volunteers can help.+0.24 vs 3.53
  2. 3.80Parent volunteers are made to feel appreciated.+0.22 vs 3.58
  3. 3.97There is adequate supervision during school.+0.20 vs 3.77
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from parents comments: Safety & supervision (8), Facilities & campus (4), Athletics & extracurriculars (4).

Roseville HS

StaffN=74

Instruction & learning

Staff at Roseville HS sit roughly -0.66 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.95Allow me to be an effective instructional leader.-0.21 vs 4.16
  2. 3.89Effective professional development related to our vision.-0.20 vs 4.09
  3. 3.95Teacher use of student achievement data.-0.20 vs 4.14
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from staff comments: Workload & rigor (5), Safety & supervision (5), Communication & info flow (4).
StudentsN=911

Expectations & rigor

Students at Roseville HS sit roughly -0.16 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.52I feel challenged at this school.-0.19 vs 3.70
  2. 3.57The work at this school is challenging.-0.12 vs 3.69
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from students comments: Lunch & food (104), Facilities & campus (63), Teachers & instruction (46).
ParentsN=104

Leadership & vision

Parents at Roseville HS sit roughly -0.22 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.47There is adequate supervision during school.-0.30 vs 3.77
  2. 3.42There is adequate supervision before and after school.-0.14 vs 3.56
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from parents comments: Safety & supervision (9), Mental health & counseling (6), Communication & info flow (6).

West Park HS

StaffN=101

At or above district — protect strength

Staff rate items at or above district across actionable themes. The work here is to protect what is being done well — particularly on the items below.

Evidence
  1. 4.01Teachers+0.29 vs 3.72
  2. 4.30The vision for this school is clear.+0.25 vs 4.05
  3. 4.21The vision for this school is shared.+0.24 vs 3.97
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from staff comments: Workload & rigor (9), Communication & info flow (7), Teachers & instruction (6).
StudentsN=410

Recognition & support

Students at West Park HS sit roughly -0.16 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.75By counselors.-0.16 vs 3.91
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from students comments: Teachers & instruction (30), Academics & college prep (23), Lunch & food (17).
ParentsN=246

Leadership & vision

Parents at West Park HS sit roughly -0.14 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.42There is adequate supervision before and after school.-0.14 vs 3.56
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from parents comments: Safety & supervision (19), Athletics & extracurriculars (17), Discipline & fairness (13).

WoodCreek HS

StaffN=116

Instruction & learning

Staff at WoodCreek HS sit roughly -0.12 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.93The instructional program at this school is challenging.-0.12 vs 4.05
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from staff comments: Workload & rigor (8), Communication & info flow (7), Facilities & campus (5).
StudentsN=1219

Instruction & learning

Students at WoodCreek HS sit roughly -0.12 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.47This school is preparing me well for what I want to do after high school.-0.13 vs 3.60
  2. 3.96Using computers.-0.11 vs 4.08
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from students comments: Lunch & food (141), Facilities & campus (117), Teachers & instruction (81).
ParentsN=124

Belonging

Parents at WoodCreek HS sit roughly -0.15 points below district on the items below — a real gap rather than measurement noise. Three items most below district are listed as evidence.

Evidence
  1. 3.95Parent volunteers are vital to the school community.-0.15 vs 4.10
Open-ended echo Top growth themes from parents comments: Athletics & extracurriculars (8), Teachers & instruction (7), Safety & supervision (6).

Site spotlight.

Click a school. Strengths and growth areas are calculated relative to the district mean for that item, weighted by sample size — a +0.30 delta means this site sits noticeably above the district on that question. Each site has both quantitative scores and open-ended responses this cycle.

Select a school below
Staff · N=17 · low n — read with caution

Strengths vs. district

  1. Develop my skills.4.59+0.38
  2. Think for myself, not just carry out instructions.4.59+0.36
  3. Recognized for good work.4.24+0.36
  4. Effective professional development related to our vision.4.41+0.32
  5. Teachers in this school communicate with each other to make student learning consistent a…4.25+0.29

Growth areas vs. district

  1. This school has a good public image.3.18-0.94
  2. The vision for this school is clear.3.47-0.58
  3. Students3.24-0.51
  4. That learning is fun at this school.3.59-0.50
  5. The instructional program at this school is challenging.3.65-0.40
Students · N=37

Strengths vs. district

  1. Understand when students have personal problems.4.05+0.35
  2. This school is fun.3.73+0.34
  3. Make learning fun.3.83+0.29
  4. By teachers.4.16+0.23
  5. The teacher is leading a discussion with the whole class.3.92+0.22

Growth areas vs. district

  1. I feel challenged at this school.3.03-0.68
  2. Participating in extracurricular activities is important to me.3.08-0.66
  3. The work at this school is challenging.3.19-0.51
  4. I am working in a small group.3.28-0.39
  5. Listening to the teacher talk.3.73-0.35
Parents · N=13 · low n — read with caution

Strengths vs. district

  1. Teachers help me know how to support my child's learning at home.4.00+0.48
  2. There is adequate supervision during school.4.23+0.46
  3. The school's assessment practices are fair.4.23+0.39
  4. Students are treated fairly by the administration.4.31+0.37
  5. There is adequate recognition of student successes.4.15+0.37

Growth areas vs. district

  1. Parent volunteers are vital to the school community.3.69-0.41
  2. The school clearly communicates how parent volunteers can help.3.23-0.30
  3. The school provides an adequate calendar of school activities.3.77-0.29
  4. I know what my child's teachers expect of my child.3.77-0.24
  5. Overall, the school has a good public image.3.92-0.18
Open-ended responses · this site
Staff · qualitative · N=17
What's working
4Other / unclassified
  • Meeting students where they are at and increasing their education and values.
  • All staff want students to succeed and are willing to differentiate to help students.
  • The small size and opportunity to know all the students.
4Belonging & community
  • We've made great strides in elevating the instruction that our students receive. Our staff consistently works together, rather than in isolation, to make curricular improvements with the intent of enhancing the learning experience for all students.
  • Making students feel welcome and important.
  • Inclusivity, adaptability and companion
What needs to change
6Other / unclassified
  • Student behavior and foul language. Being on time and staying in class
  • Funding
  • holding students accountable for their behavior and their apathy to education and work they refuse to do or refuse to turn in on time.
Students · qualitative · N=37
What's working
19Other / unclassified
  • The events and classes they have
  • This school is fun alot of people relate to me and understand and care for me
  • all the staff is really nice
4Schedule & bell schedule
  • the schedule; and the campus
  • schedule
  • The open schedule
4Teachers & instruction
  • The support they give and they're way of teaching students
  • The atmosphere and vibe is good and the teachers seem like they want to help you and for you to learn.
  • I like how all of the teachers are super understanding and know hot to teach so that everyone can be successful
2Belonging & community
  • The community and schedule
  • that the teacher connect with you more.
2Lunch & food
  • I like how kind the teachers and staff are and they all seem to enjoy their job. Teachers also make work fun. There are lots of snacks and resources and fun activities as well.
  • I like all the fun activities we do and I really enjoy the extra help they provide with not just education but food and personal hygiene products.
What needs to change
14Other / unclassified
  • wider variety of classes
  • I wish the students talked to me more
  • help us understand better
9Facilities & campus
  • the bathrooms being open all day and hope they get bigger
  • maybe let more people go to the restroom but have worker monitor
  • different bathroom rules and to open the other bathrooms
Parents · qualitative · N=13
What's working
5Other / unclassified · Mrs. HEALY AND Mrs (1), Mr. FERNANDEZ TENDS TO (1)
  • Flexible learning, student support
  • Flexibility for students. Meeting students where they are.
  • Small classes
What needs to change
2Other / unclassified
  • Better school monitors with more training
  • More active engagement with students on job opportunities while in high school and how to navigate job search post graduation

Stakeholder triangulation.

For the seven themes asked of all three groups, how do staff, students, and parents see the same school? Each row plots the three group means on a 1–5 scale; the wider the dots are spread, the larger the within-site disagreement. That spread is often the actionable signal — where adults and the kids in the building, or school and home, see something differently.

Staff Students Parents spread ≥ 0.50

Item explorer.

Every score, every site, every item. Sort, filter, search.

Stakeholder School Theme Item Score District Δ N

Five insights for the cabinet.

Findings derived directly from the 1,248 survey scores below. Headlines and supporting numbers are computed; narrative reads are editable starting points — not the final story. Use these to frame the conversation, then sharpen the language together.

Draft · numbers are live; copy is a starting point

2026–27 priorities.

Five district-wide priorities scoped from the perception data. Each is anchored to a specific stakeholder group, the lowest-scoring theme in their view, the size of the cross-site spread (high spread = leadership-driven; low spread = system-wide), and concrete next moves. Site-specific accountability lives on each school's own dashboard.

Method

Priorities are ranked by combined signal: depth of the gap (theme mean below 4.0), breadth of the gap (number of stakeholders flagging the same area), and leverage (cross-site spread, which signals what site leadership can move).

Out of scope

Items below 30 respondents at a single site are excluded from the priority math but flagged elsewhere. Roseville Adult is reviewed separately. Open-ended themes inform the rationale but are not used to rank.

Draft · numbers are live; rationale + actions are starting points